Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 05:40

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Why does he text me first but when I never text first he gets mad?
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What is a good moisturizer and sunscreen for oily skin for a girl like me who is 17?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
How to Watch Tonight's NBA Finals Indiana Pacers vs. Oklahoma City Thunder Game 1 for Free - CNET
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Which MacBook should you buy in 2025? - 9to5Mac
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Volcanic Eruptions Can Create Ice in The Sky, And We Finally Know How - ScienceAlert
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Culpa nobis molestiae ab dignissimos omnis nesciunt.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
China's electric cars are cheaper, but is there a deeper cost? - BBC